The CCAMLR krill synoptic survey


 

Acoustic Sampling Protocols

The following protocols are set for the purpose of standardizing acoustic data collection and archival from multiple-ships during the multi-national effort to synoptically survey the entirety of FAO area 48 during the austral summer of 1999/2000. Methods for data analysis are not considered here, rather the primary objective of these protocols is to make the data collections as comprehensive and uniform as possible across all research platforms. Whenever possible, exact equipment, software, and settings have been dictated. In the cases where exact matches are not possible, pertinent comparative information has been specified.
 

Echosounder:

      Simrad EK500 scientific Echosounder, Modified Firmware V5.3 (Modified for 1 ms 200 kHz pulse duration)

    Transducers

      The following transducer models are strongly preferred:

    Transceivers

    Settings

Data Logging:

System Calibration

Standard sphere calibrations

  • System calibrations will be performed at all three frequencies immediately before and after the survey in Stromness Bay, South Georgia (pre-cruise) and Admiralty Bay, King George Island (post-cruise).
  • If at all possible, the transducer faces must be cleaned of debris and bio-fouling immediately prior to the initial calibration.
  • Record must be made of the calibration: date; time; location; sea state (swell, wind, currents, ice); water temperature profile; salinity profile; sound speed profile; bottom depth; calibration apparatus; and ship's mooring configuration.
  • The 38.1 mm WC sphere will be used as the standard target; all spheres will be purchased from a single production lot and each will be modified with small sputtered holes into which a single loop of monofilament attachment line will be glued.
  • Theoretical TS=f(bandwidth and sound speed) will be obtained from Appendix D (theoretical TS values calculated for various anticipated sound speeds and for nomimal EK500 bandwidths).
  • On-axis TS and Sa measurements will be made for each frequency at a range of 30m (see Simrad Calibration of the EK500 /EY500 - P2260/859-043867/4AA011, pp 1-36).
  • The EK500 transceiver gain settings will be set to the calibrated Sv and TS gains.
  • The EK500 transducer beamwidths should be set to the transducer calibration specifications provided by Simrad, as adjusted for sound speed (see Appendix D).
  • The EK500 transducer off-axis angles should be set to 0.0 degrees.
  • During the entirety of both pre- and post-survey calibration experiments, all acoustic data will be logged using EchoLogEK.
  • Lobe files will also be logged whilst the TS gain is determined for the 38 and 120 kHz split-beam subsystems.
  • Multi-frequency Target Strength Calibrations

  • The effectiveness of a split-beam echosounder system to reject echoes from unresolvable scatterers, thereby improving the measurements of in-situ target strengths (TS) of individuals, is dramatically enhanced by combining synchronized signals from two or more adjacent split-beam transducers of different frequencies. By utilizing the angular positional information from one of the split-beam transducers, additional corresponding TS measurements were shown to be obtainable from a juxtaposed single-beam transducer. Multi-frequency TS measurements provided information about the identity of constituents in a mixed species assemblage.
  • To determine the positional transform equations for each transducer, three-frequency TS measurements should be made of the 38.1 mm WC sphere as it is moved throughout the beams of the three transducers; all echo-trace data from this exercise should be logged using EchoLogEK.
  • To check the system calibrations, to determine positional transform equations for each transducer, and to demonstrate the TS versus scatter size relationships, TS measurements should also be made of 13.7, 23.0, and 60.0 mm Cu spheres at each of the three frequencies as they are moved throughout the beams.
  • During the entirety of these calibration experiments, all acoustic data will be logged using EchoLogEK.
  • Inter-ship Calibration Comparisons

  • Selected shallow water survey transects in both Stromness Bay (start-end positions) and Admiralty Bay (start-end positions) should be repeated by each vessel; the seafloor scattering can thereby be used as the standard for comparisons. Sea state and ship speed and direction should be concurrently recorded with these measurements.
  • Characterization of System Noise

    Survey Operations

    Additional Recommendations

    Necessary Preliminary Investigations

    References

    D.A. Demer, M.A. Soule and R.P. Hewitt, "A multiple-frequency method for potentially improving the accuracy and precision of in-situ target strength measurements," J. Acoust. Soc. Am., in press.

    K.G. Foote, "Maintaining precision calibrations with optimal copper spheres," J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73, 1054-1063 (1983).

    K.G. Foote, "Spheres for calibrating an eleven-frequency acoustic measurement system," ICES J. Mar Sci. 46:284-286 (1990).

    D.G.M. Miller, "Suggested outline for the design and implementation of future near-synoptic krill surveys., WG-Krill-94/20

    W.D. Tesler, "The preparation of recommendations and standard procedures for krill acoustic surveys, WG-KRILL-93/5


     
    Introduction Itinerary Station positions Cruise tracks Planning Meeting Sampling Protocols Participants Background papers Contents

    This protocol has been developed by D.A. Demer (U.S.A.), Andrew Brierley (U.K.) and Tim Pauly (Australia)
    Page last updated on 17 March 1999