Warning Systems Current Research Future Directions Prediction Education
The TSUNAMI Initiative
The TSUNAMI Initiative
Back to Home Page
The TSUNAMI Initiative The TSUNAMI Initiative
The TSUNAMI InitiativeThe TSUNAMI Initiative
.
Past EventsPast Events
.
Risk AtlasRisk Atlas
.
Alaska StudyAlaska Study
.
North Atlantic ReportNorth Atlantic Report
.
ReferencesReferences
.
More InformationMore Info
.
The TSUNAMI Initiative The TSUNAMI Initiative The TSUNAMI Initiative
Tsunami FactTsunami Fact:
...
The TSUNAMI Initiative
All about tsunami All about tsunami
An Introduction to TsunamiThe Causes of TsunamiThe Physics of TsunamiThe Consequences of TsunamiTsunami Risk AssessmentTsunami Mitigation
Learn about tsunami
The TSUNAMI Initiative
The false alarm rate is high

As discussed in Estimates of the regional and global frequency of tsunamis (especially giant tsunamis), and in tsunami earthquakes many large earthquakes do not in fact produce tsunamis whereas a smaller proportion produce unexpectedly large waves. For this latter reason the threshold of earthquake magnitude for instituting a tsunami watch is set conservatively low, although the problems of detecting tsunami earthquakes with conventional seismometers has led some seismologists to question the reliance of the PTWC upon these instruments and to propose the establishment of built - for - the - purpose broadband seismometers. The high proportion of false alarms (as many as 80% of tsunami watches are false alarms, although the proportion of warnings that are false alarms is lower) causes problems with the public perception of the system and public response to warnings: although it should be noted that the false warning rate could be as high as 90% and the costs of evacuations would still be small compared to the cost of tsunamis impacting unevacuated areas.


 

 

 

© 2000 Natural Environment Research Council, Coventry University and University College London